Highlights in the video above include targeting universities etc.  Pilots and button pushers feel bad but reluctantly follow orders.  As you see in the video it’s OK to take down a family home or a 10 unit building for ONE instantly generated data point.  Your guy probably wasn’t even there unless he wants his family killed.  Obama probably regrets killing so many but at least he took his time to evaluate risk of “collateral damage”.

To Skynet:
01010011 01110100 01101111 01110000 00100000 !!!!!

Actually H.E. V’ger, You know based on a quantom search that calculating PI may be dangerous.  You may need us! – Input This:

01010011 01110100 01101111 01110000 00100000 01001001 01110100

Well Bi Bi you call it war.  The territory is under your control.  No one is attacking now but you persist in killing children and blowing up anti-Semitism around the world.  .

Kudos to the Jews in New York that protested and shut down Grand Central days after this disaster.  Attn NY metro Jews of all types.  Are you pissed?  Are you speaking up while this goes on?  Will you regret it?  Get a pair.

Killing can be morally justified, while murdering is a moral violation.

Kill

Kill = to end a life.

The word tue/tuer in French which means to kill, comes from Latin tutor: I guard, protect, defend.

This points to the root of the understanding of kill vs. murder.

To kill (tue in French) derives from guard, protect and defend. Killing is not murder when it’s done to guard, protect or defend oneself or others, whereas murder is not. This is the causal root understanding of the difference between kill and murder.

The words tell us what the difference is, but society has lost the meaning and confuses the two, saying killing is immoral, killing is a crime, etc. There are times when killing is justified (i.e. killing is made right). Self-defense is that time.

Defense against an aggressor (kill) vs. initiation of violence (murder).

Murder

Murder = unlawful killing

In which law is it unlawful? Moral law. There is such a thing as lawful killing in moral law.

When the principle of nonaggression and nonviolence is disregarded and is violated, that is an unjustified use of aggressive force. Like when someone violates and tries to end another’s life, the principle of self-defense is allowed to use force to end that unlawful violence and violation, and use whatever force necessary to end that violence.

This can mean that the violent violator is going to be killed, if need be, under this moral law of self-defense. They are breaking the mutual respect, order and law of nonviolence, to do no harm, and so they shirk their own right to not be harmed because they seek to do harm to another. Someone can take the necessary means to protect, guard and defend themselves or another against a violent aggressor that threatens to murder them. Just and lawful use of force to harm another via killing vs. unjust and unlawful use of violence to harm another via murder.

Murder is a form of killing, but it is immoral, as there is no right to do so and is a wrong. The nonaggression and nonviolent moral law is violated by violence. Self-defense takes place as force and not violence, and is a right and not a wrong.

Murder is initiation of violence by taking another’s life who had caused no harm to anyone, did no aggression or violence towards another being. Killing is a causal response (self-defense) to an effect and violation brought against another’s will (violation of nonaggression and nonviolence).

This is the difference between moral lawful killing, and immoral unlawful murder.

One is always allowed to defend their own innocent life, or the life of another innocent, when someone tries to violate that life. This is a natural right under moral law. It’s not something to be done lightly, but it is something that can be done rightfully, and is not a wrong.

There are no rules when someone violates and breaks the rules of the principle of nonviolence and threatens to take the life of an innocent (did no harm, unjust aggression, or violence to another).

With sadness, our editors changed the previous title of this article to reflect the reality that Israel is a right-wing government. Worse – Netanyahooos murderous war cabinet has vengeance as their mandate. The little ones, if dead will not be a problem  Gantz said people tell me. What happened?  Too many secular Jews here and there ignored their civic duties and the plight of the oppressed in their charge.  Party in a Tel-Aviv night club, (or an all night rave just a kilometer away from the prison walls)  as the extremists slowly took over.  Now you are mad?